Margin Account Engine Verification
Overview
This case study demonstrates how CodeLogician ensures mathematical correctness in institutional trading risk management systems. We formally verify a margin account state machine that enforces regulatory requirements to prevent catastrophic losses in leveraged trading accounts.
What's at Stake
A bug in margin enforcement logic could bankrupt a broker-dealer.
The 2021 Archegos Capital collapse caused $10+ billion in losses across Credit Suisse, Nomura, and other prime brokers due to inadequate margin enforcement. This is not theoretical—it's existential risk for financial institutions.
The Business Problem
What is Margin Trading?
When clients borrow money to buy securities (margin trading), the broker must continuously monitor their equity position. If the market moves against the client and their equity falls below regulatory thresholds, the broker must force liquidation of assets.
Failure to do so exposes the broker to unlimited losses if the client becomes insolvent.
Regulatory Requirements
Regulation T (Federal Reserve)
- Initial Margin: 50%
- Required equity when opening positions
- Ensures clients have "skin in the game"
- Applies to all margin accounts
FINRA Rule 4210
- Maintenance Margin: 25%
- Minimum equity to avoid liquidation
- Breach triggers margin call
- Failure to meet = forced liquidation
The State Machine
The margin account operates as a finite state machine with three states representing account health:
Account Health States
| State | Condition | Allowed Actions |
|---|---|---|
HEALTHY | Equity Ratio ≥ Initial Margin (50%) | Open positions, Withdraw funds |
RESTRICTED | Maintenance ≤ Equity Ratio < Initial | Hold positions only |
LIQUIDATION_CALL | Equity Ratio < Maintenance (25%) | Must liquidate assets |
The Verification
Core Status Check Logic
def check_status(self) -> AccountStatus:
"""
Determine current margin account status based on equity ratio.
State Logic:
- No position: HEALTHY (cash-only account)
- Equity ratio >= initial_margin: HEALTHY
- maintenance_margin <= Equity ratio < initial_margin: RESTRICTED
- Equity ratio < maintenance_margin: LIQUIDATION_CALL
"""
equity_ratio = self.calculate_equity_ratio()
# No position means pure cash account (always healthy)
if equity_ratio is None:
return AccountStatus.HEALTHY
# Check maintenance margin threshold (most critical)
if equity_ratio < self.margin_requirements.maintenance_margin_pct / Decimal("100"):
return AccountStatus.LIQUIDATION_CALL
# Check initial margin threshold
if equity_ratio < self.margin_requirements.initial_margin_pct / Decimal("100"):
return AccountStatus.RESTRICTED
return AccountStatus.HEALTHYEquity Calculation
Equity Ratio
Real-World Example
Scenario: Market Decline
Initial Position
- Cash Balance:
- $10,000
- Shares:
- 100 @ $400
- Market Value:
- $40,000
- Loan Value:
- $30,000
- Equity:
- $20,000
- Equity Ratio:
- 50%
- Status:
- HEALTHY ✅
After 40% Market Decline
- Cash Balance:
- $10,000
- Shares:
- 100 @ $240
- Market Value:
- $24,000 ↓
- Loan Value:
- $30,000
- Equity:
- $4,000 ↓
- Equity Ratio:
- 16.7% ↓
- Status:
- LIQUIDATION_CALL ❌
Automatic Protection Triggered
When equity ratio drops below 25%, the system automatically enters LIQUIDATION_CALL state. This is mathematically guaranteed by formal verification—no code path can bypass this protection.
Edge Cases Handled
Division by Zero
calculate_equity_ratio() returns None.Pure cash accounts are always HEALTHY.Decimal Precision
Uses Python's Decimal type instead of float.
Prevents rounding errors that could cause margin violations to go undetected.
Boundary Conditions
- Equity = maintenance → RESTRICTED
- Equity = initial → HEALTHY
Key Results
Verification Summary
| Property | What We Proved | Status | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solvency Safety | Low equity MUST trigger liquidation | ✅ PROVED | Broker protected from client insolvency |
| No Gap Risk | No withdrawal can immediately cause margin call | ✅ PROVED | No "flash crash" from normal operations |
| Withdrawal Protection | Withdrawals maintain initial margin | ✅ PROVED | Clients can't drain equity below safety |
| Complete Coverage | All 4 behavioral regions identified | ✅ COMPLETE | 100% path coverage for testing |
Business Value
Mathematical Certainty
Regulatory Compliance
Formal proofs provide auditable evidence for Regulation T and FINRA 4210 compliance. Regulators can review the mathematical guarantees.
Risk Elimination
The Archegos-style scenario—where margin enforcement fails—is provably impossible with this verified implementation.
Production Ready
Download the Code
Broader Applications
This verification approach applies to any risk management system with:
✅ Threshold-Based Rules
✅ State Machines
Account status, order lifecycle, trade workflow, approval processes
✅ Financial Calculations
Interest calculations, fee computations, P&L tracking, collateral management
✅ Regulatory Requirements
Industry Examples
- Prime Brokerage: Margin account monitoring, securities lending, client risk management
- Proprietary Trading: Position limits, risk controls, automated circuit breakers
- Asset Management: Portfolio compliance, investment policy enforcement
- Clearing Houses: Member margin requirements, default waterfall logic
- Retail Brokers: Pattern day trader rules, options approval levels
Key Takeaways
Solvency Protected
Regulatory Confidence
Formal verification provides auditable evidence for Regulation T and FINRA 4210 compliance.
Production Ready
Verify your risk management systems with mathematical certainty
Use CodeLogician to ensure your margin calculations, position limits, and compliance rules are provably correct.